by Traverse Legal, reviewed by Enrico Schaefer - March 24, 2009 - Alternative Billing
Do you want to know what the best part of hourly billing is? Hands down, bar none, the best reason to bill by the hour is its simplicity. In fact, it is really thoughtless on almost every level. A client calls with a problem, you tell them what the retainer amount is, and you get to work. Putting aside for a second the fact that hourly billing does nothing to provoke a conversation as to whether or not legal work should actually be done in the first place; I believe that it is the simplicity of the business model that perpetuates the hourly billing system.
I will be the first to admit that proposing a flat fee, defined deliverable project for a client requires intellect and some level of effort. You have to get enough information from the client to understand the scope of the project and the value proposition behind engaging in the legal work. You have to decide what phase one will look like, identify deliverables for the client and develop a flat fee price for those deliverables. There is nothing thoughtless about proposing a defined deliverable flat fee project.
But for those of you who do not mind actually using your high-powered brains, are interested in providing tremendous value to your client and you are as interested in the outcomes as your client may be, proposing a legal project to a client has huge advantages.
The art of preparing a project proposal to a client involves these basic (and relatively easy) steps:
Yes, you are going to be doing a little bit of work in order to create a project proposal. However, you typically would not engage in this activity unless the client had already indicated the desire to move forward. Ninety-five percent of the projects that we propose get accepted by the client as proposed or with minor revisions. We are paid up-front, so we do not have to worry about sending out any further bills or collection. The art of flat fee defined deliverable billing really isn’t much of an art at all. It is just common sense.
As a founding partner of Traverse Legal, PLC, he has more than thirty years of experience as an attorney for both established companies and emerging start-ups. His extensive experience includes navigating technology law matters and complex litigation throughout the United States.
This page has been written, edited, and reviewed by a team of legal writers following our comprehensive editorial guidelines. This page was approved by attorney Enrico Schaefer, who has more than 20 years of legal experience as a practicing Business, IP, and Technology Law litigation attorney.